Home > US under-represents civilian drone deaths, secret files show

US under-represents civilian drone deaths, secret files show

US nation­al securi­ty whistl­e-blower reveal­s inner workin­gs of Obama’s drone wars

Obama’s 14-month kill/capture campaign in Afghanistan killed 219 individuals in airstrikes and only 35 terrorists. PHOTO: REUTERS

Obama’s 14-month kill/capture campaign in Afghanistan killed 219 individuals in airstrikes and only 35 terrorists. PHOTO: REUTERS

WASHINGTON: US President Barack Obama’s administration has under-represented the true number of civilians killed in drone strikes, a news site said in citing a cache of secret files it published.

On Thursday, the news site The Intercept unveiled documents leaked by a whistle-blower about America’s use of drones against terror targets in the Middle East and Central Asia.

Since taking office in 2009, Obama has vastly expanded the drone programme, authorising many more strikes than his Republican predecessor, George W Bush.

The US military describes fatalities from these strikes as “enemy killed in action,” even if their identity is unknown or they were not the intended targets, according to The Intercept.


Read: In policy reversal, Obama slows pace of US troop withdrawal in Afghanistan

And the strikes often kill many more people than intended, which runs counter to White House and Pentagon claims that the strikes are precise and result in minimal casualties, it said.

Documents detailing a mission called Operation Haymaker showed that US special operations airstrikes killed more than 200 people in northeastern Afghanistan from January 2012 to February 2013.

But only 35 of those casualties were intended targets.

And in one five-month period of the operation, nearly 90 per cent of those killed in airstrikes were not the intended targets, The Intercept reported.

The US has better intelligence in Afghanistan — America’s longest war — than in places like Yemen and Somalia, where the ratios may be equivalent or even worse, it said.

Read: US not leaving Afghanistan, says Pentagon

The Intercept said the leaked documents came from a source it did not identify who works in the intelligence community.

US government statements minimising the number of civilian casualties from drone strikes were “exaggerating at best, if not outright lies,” the source told the website.

“It’s a phenomenal gamble.”


Asked about the report, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Obama “has obviously made a policy decision to try to be as transparent as possible about our counterterrorism operations all around the world.”

Those operations “go to great lengths to limit civilian casualties,” Earnest added.

The report said intelligence analysts create portraits of suspects and the threats they pose and present them in individual summaries known as a “baseball card.”

The information is then placed in a targeting package for action by higher authorities.

This approach allows for more subjective, mistake-prone human interpretation — fuelling the risk that those involved in targeted killings believe they have “godlike powers,” the source said.

Read: More troops may be needed in Afghanistan post-2016: US commander

It takes an average of 58 days for the president to sign off on a target, according to one slide. US forces then have 60 days to hit the target.

The documents acknowledge that the signals intelligence, which includes information on communications systems, upon which the US military relies heavily in unconventional battlefields is “poor and limited.”

And yet this data, collected in large part by foreign partners, accounted for more than half the intelligence used to track potential targets in Somalia and Yemen, The Intercept said.

The Intercept is co-founded by award-winning journalist Glenn Greenwald, who published documents leaked by former US intelligence contractor Edward Snowden detailing massive electronic surveillance by US intelligence agencies.

About Amin Khan

Amin Khan is a web developer, SEO expert, Online Mentor & marketer working from last 4 years on the internet and managing several successful websites.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *