The arguments of the parties in the electoral fraud case, the Commission reserved its decision
Islamabad: electoral fraud case after the arguments of the parties in the case, the Commission reserved.
News headed by Chief Justice Nasir-ul-Mulk 3-member commission of inquiry to investigate alleged rigging in the 2013 general election for the hearing. According to the commission of inquiry that all the political parties, the Commission recorded the statements of 69 witnesses in 39 meetings in 86 days.
EC Advocate Salman Akram Raja’s lawyer said that his arguments are technical errors in elections around the world. And elections are not free of errors, but also by PTI 12 requests could not prove anything. But the case of Urdu Bazar additional 200 people also were raised. Some of which have been proven and the EC did not have any evidence which proves that conducting elections were rigged. It would be wrong to say that a mandate has been stolen election day. He reported that 6 thousand Nadra ID cards could not be verified. Nadra also admitted that errors can, and if they did not vote rigging were not verified, it can not be called bogus votes.